Abstract
In several pharmacologic, pharmacology, and alternative medicine studies, oral administration of medication or test substances to experimental animals is needed. It is clinically sound and recommended to administer test substances to experimental animals along the same route that they are taken or expected to be taken by humans as general bioavailability; the pharmacology and pharmacology parameters obtained for the drug will depend significantly on the route chosen to administer it. The lack of ready access to high-quality oral tubing built for different species, as well as a widespread lack of technical expertise to properly use out-of-the-box techniques in this part of the world, has made this route controversial among medicine scientists. The typical problems and difficulties associated with the oral administration of test product solutions were avoided by mistreating either the syringe alone or incorporating it into the animals' feeds or drinkables. This jury-rigged oral tubing was also used to ensure that the expected doses were correctly administered in each case.
Key Words
Oral Administration, Experimental Animal, Cannula
Introduction
The most popular form of medication administration to humans is oral administration. It's also the fastest, most comfortable, and most cost-effective alternative. Where oral therapy is not necessary because the patient is noncompliant, unconscious, or unable to absorb what is offered by mouth, parenteral therapy is used. The injection of a drug to laboratory animals necessitates careful consideration, with the goal of maximizing the agent's distribution while minimizing the animal's potential for adverse reactions. The instrumentation that is used to distribute substances to animals is determined by the duration of the study as well as the type of fabric that is being applied. Additionally, Upon the administration of the suspensions or solutions, Methods of vehicle incorporation and vehicle itself must be chosen carefully. The testing team, veterinarians, and technical staff should keep in mind the reasons for choosing a package for drug distribution and carefully consider how substances would be prepared and stored before being administered to animals. Failure to consider these factors during the design of experiments could result in unintended negative effects on experimental animals and muddled results.
In toxicology, pharmacology, medical specialties, and drug development trials, oral administration of materials may be a standard practice. Oral delivery is less invasive than other widely used body routes, such as blood vessel and intraperitoneal administration, and may be a more physiological and clinically applicable option for evaluating the effectiveness of medication for treating human diseases, since most human medication is taken orally. The intra-gastric feeding procedure, which includes handling and restraining the animal, inserting a feeding needle into the esophagus, and injecting the drug directly into the abdomen through a syringe, is often used to achieve oral administration in conscious animals. Oral feeding, despite its efficacy, has been linked to metastasis involvement, abdominal distension, and the production of granulation inside the cavity after repeated dosing. Furthermore, as seen in a recent study, the strenuous restraint of warning animals necessary to escape technical complications triggers stress responses that have a major effect on physiology and alter experimental outcomes. These intra-gastric feeding problems can be more difficult if the handler is inexperienced or inept in animal handling.
Oral Dosing
Instruments used for stomachic forced feeding, pilling (including capsule administration), and powdery diet are the most widely used for oral dosing. Water bottles affixed to the caging are used to administer liquid and soluble substances directly or as binary compound solutions for voluntary use.
Gavage
To avoid the intra-tracheal dosing and any aspiration chances and to prefer the unconditioned reflex, animals are given the oral dose in their state of consciousness. For this purpose, we can use the feeding needles that are curved or may be straight and also the medication gavage tubes. Advantage of the ball tipped needles that are stainless is that they are easy to sterilize and clean, but the disadvantage is that it imposes a greater risk of rupturing the muscle system if it is pushed into the body. Tissue injury risk or the puncture can be minimized by using the plastic or rubber feeding needles having narrower and more adaptable rubber, but it requires the mouth gag to be used in larger animals because they may chew the needles if not properly placed inside their mouth. For the acute or more frequent but fixed doses can be accurately given using the nasogastric tubes for several days to hold a suture. We will require a Elizabethan collar incase if nasogastric tubes is placed on the left side so that the animal can be prevented from dislodging the tube. Whereas some animals do not enable us to use to these collars. Moreover, permanent inborn reflex can occur in cases of the chronic tube replacements.
Pilling or Bolus Delivery
Pills and capsules are issued to rodents weighing more than 150 grams for example cats and dogs as well as rabbits using balling arms. Pill and the plunger can be hold together by using the slender, onerous and long metal or plastic tubes having a small slot at its top and it can be done accurately until the administration of the pill at the back of the animal's tongue. Hence the capsules can be administered to the abdomen or the distal passageway of the rodents. Pill can also be inserted using an alternative method into the hollow conduit tip and making it a gastric tube through the stomach. After the tube is at its postion we can force the air bolus into the conduit to dislodge the pill. We can use the lubricant that is oil based in order to avoid the compromise the integrity of the capsule in case they are made of gelatin because the water content will dissolve it. As the tube of the lumen is at risk of blocking by the pill, so proper tube can be positioned and ensured only after the pill is dispensed.
Medicated Food and Food Treats
Commercially available pre-formulated treats containing a variety of medications are available for a variety of animals, and personalized treats may also be made. Pelletized diets are often purchased or modified to include drugs or substitute ingredients in precise doses. Electronically regulated feeders that can automatically operate themselves because times are preset for opening and closing, are available in specialized cages to hold or restrict the number of medicated diets eaten, as well as to monitor the temporal order and length of feeding sessions. For dogs and larger animals, similar gating devices with a radiofrequency-emitting collar are helpful to monitor or document access to prescribed medication feeds.
Laboratory Animals
Worldwide Guiding Principles: A Tool for Harmonization
Globalization of science and moral qualities have prompted
usage of guidelines on security of creatures utilized
for logical purposes around the world, in view of the
standards of substitution and refinement. In any case, while guidelines in
individual nations are by and large dependent on these standards, there are
varieties in the way they are essentially applied. Consequently, worldwide, and
worldwide associations have created core values to fit creature care and
utilize and have given suggestions, which can be comparatively applied
regardless of the administrative structure working in a specific country.
Oversight of Research Animal Welfare in the United
States
The utilization of creatures in exploration in the
United States (US) is represented by various longstanding guidelines and
guidelines. The Animal Welfare Act and Regulations declared by the US
Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, administers
explicitly characterized vertebrate creatures utilized for research, testing,
educating, presentation, and trade. This government law gives explicit
necessities to creature care, which incorporates angles from support and
institutional survey to veterinary consideration and revealing. The Guide gives
a nitty gritty arrangement of execution guidelines incorporating significant
subjects like Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) design and
capacity, word related wellbeing and security, creature climate and the board,
veterinary consideration, and actual plant. The cornerstones of the US
regulations and guidelines are the IACUC, the Institutional Official, and the
central role of the attending veterinarian. All must work together in providing
an animal care and use program that ensures the well-being of animals and the
integrity of science.
Mice
The mouse and human genomes are about 85% the
equivalent, and the similitudes have made the mouse a ground-breaking model for
examining human science and sicknesses. Dealing with, blood assortment, and
medication organization are same as rodent.
Table 1. Details of the Mice
Lifespan |
1-3 years |
Adult weight |
M 20-30g, F 18-35g |
Birth weight |
1-2g |
Heart rate |
310-840 beats/minute |
Respiratory rate |
80-230 breaths/minute |
Body temp. |
36.5-38 C |
Rats
Rats were first utilized for exploratory purposes
during the 1800s, deliberately reared rats are utilized in creature testing for
various reasons, including their successive multiplication, hereditary virtue,
and similitudes to human science.
Table 2. Details of the
Rats
Lifespan |
2.5-3.5 years |
Adult weight |
M 300-500g, F 250-300g |
Birth weight |
5-6g |
Heart rate |
330-480 beats/minute |
Respiratory rate |
85 breaths/minute |
Body temperature |
35.9-37.5°C |
Frog or Toad
physiological
Studies
Guinea pig: hypersensitive test (allergic
reaction) or the screening of anti-asthmatic drugs
Rabbit
expensive, the effect of some drugs
Solid or Liquid
Dosage Forms or Substances to be Administered Via Oral Route
Introduction
Prior to controlling any substance (remedial or
test) to a creature subject, one should think about the pH, sterility, and
synthetic nature (scent, taste, mucosal touchiness, osmolarity, dissolvability,
light affectability, and risk status) of the compound and settle on proper
choices on the portion to be managed, recurrence of organization, volume to be
directed, the dissolvable (if important), and course of organization.
Parameters
Name of
compound or a concise synthetic portrayal if not by and large known (except if
restrictive).
Ø Dose (mg/kg) of compound.
Ø Route of organization
Ø Volume of organization.
Frequency of organization, and spans between
rehashed organization Information on dissolvable/vehicle including pH and other
substance attributes.
Effects of compound as well as vehicle including
planned impacts and results.
Characteristics
of Compound and Solvent (Vehicle)
pH
Know the pH of the compound AND the vehicle. Focus
on pH ~7. On the off chance that the pH is sequential attempt one of the
accompanying:
Cushion to
pH 7 if conceivable
Weaken the arrangement utilizing clean typical
saline or PBS
Sterility
Filtration and other cleansing methods are
required to deliver the compounds maintaining their sterility. Only those
compounds are allowed to be regulated that are mixtures of pharmaceutical
grades.
Odor
Voluntary intake of the compound is sometimes
affected by the odor of the compound that can be offensive.
Taste
Some mixtures that are prepared in the normal
water must be having sucrose in order to improve their taste that can be very
bitter otherwise and effect the intake. These incorporate yet are not
restricted to antibiotic medication, doxycycline, and metronidazole. 2.5 to 5
grams of the sucrose can provide a satisfactory improvement in the taste of the
solution.
Mucosal Peevishness
PI to check tissue similarity while applying to
the mucosal surfaces while directing such mixtures, for example to the windpipe
or to the eyes.
Osmolarity
Osmolarity should be 280 osmoles i.e. iso osmolar
in case of the parenterally administered mixtures. For example, the Lactated ringer solution
containing dextrose 5% is itself iso osmolar without help from anyone else,
delivers the water and CO2 causing the resultant mixture to be iso osmotic as
well. Be that as it may, alert is exhorted in a got dried out creature.
Solubility
Some
substances are insoluble in water requiring them to be incorporated into a
suspension form. A model is
sulfamethoxazole trimethoprim suspension that is
controlled in the normal water. Regular
shaking is required in this suspension to get the accurate dose on daily basis.
Light Affectability
By using a glass cover foil made up of plastic or
rubber or even by using the glass that is hued. Some antibiotics like the sulfa
and trim are incorporated in this way.
Toxicity
PI to report any substance or a vehicle that is
new to be directed to creatures to decide limits to utilize and results.
Oral Dose Equipment
Powdered
diet, gastric gavage and sometimes pilling are the most commonly used
equipments for the oral dosing even including the capsule administration.
Liquid and water-dissolvable stuffs usually can be
administered either by incorporating into an aqeous solution for the voluntary
feeding by the animals by placing them in their cages or administered directly.
Table 3. Types of Needles
and Gavages that are used for Oral Administration in Animal
Stretchy
or Firmly Straight Needles |
Ball-Tipped
Stainless Steel Needles |
Nasogastric
Tubes |
Stretchy
or firm straight or arched gavage needles as well as nasogastric
pediatric feeding tubes have less
possibility of tissue rupture.
|
Ball-tipped stainless
steel needles can be easily
clean and sanitize though have a great
esophageal breach risk, if their
passage is enforced into the animal's mouth. |
They may
be used for critical dosing in large
animals or may be affixed in place for some days via stay suture or by using surgical glue drop.
|
but if
they are not located properly in animal's mouth then they may be crushed by
animal. |
|
An
Elizabethan collar may be required
to avert animal
from removing tube.
|
and to use
for animals with large size then they require a mouth gag. |
|
Few
animals don't gladly bear these collars. |
|
|
Chronic
tube placement might cause frequent emesis in few animals. |
Procedure for Oral
Administration in Animals
Materials Required
Ø Feeding needles or metal gavage of appropriate size
Ø Feeding needles or plastic gavage of appropriate size
Ø Red Rubber Flexible Feeding Tube - 8fr (for Rats only)
Ø Syringes of suitable size
Ø Administrating Solution or complex mixture
Ø Towel (if required) to wrap rats if flexible red rubber
feeding tubes are used
Table
4. Suggested Maximum
Administration Volume and Gavage Needle Size
SPECIES |
GAUGE |
LENGTH |
BALL DIAMETER |
VOLUME |
EXAMPLE |
MOUSE |
24-20 G |
2.5-3.8 cm |
1.25-2.25 mm |
<10 ml/kg |
For a mouse of 25gm, 0.25ml
would be maximum volume |
RAT |
20-16 G |
3.8 – 10 cm (1.5-4”) |
2.25-4.0 mm |
<10 ml/kg |
For a rat of 250 gm, 2.5 ml would be maximum
volume |
Figure 1
Metal gavage, plastic gavage needles and red rubber feeding tubes for rats
Procedure
To calculate maximum volume to be administered, first of all weigh the selected animal
Then select gavage needle finest for your use. For mice and rats, there are flexible plastic and metal feeding needles in numerous dimensions.
Metal gavage needles are usually easy to use for mice as they can’t morsel the tube but are at higher risk to harm esophagus if mouse scuffles.
Curved or straight metal gavage needles are accessible but their choice hinge on individual penchant and practice.
Flexible plastic gavage needles (for rats or mice) or red rubber feeding tubes (for rats) are less likely to damage esophagus. Though animals can morsel them and they also need some training to use efficiently.
Measure distance from the oral cavity to the end of xiphoid process that is the sternum’s caudal point, by using feeding tube or needle on restrained animal’s outside, before performing oral gavage procedure. This would be the expanse for needle to be introduced into esophagus. By using a small piece of tape or a permanent marker, mark this distance on needle.
Measurement of distance from oral cavity to xiphoid process in Ra
Conclusion
A central important aspect of many research projects and clinical trials is the administration of substances to animals via various routes for example oral route. To ensure that experiments involving the experimental administration of substances to animals are adequately prepared and performed, several considerations must be addressed by the study staff, veterinarians, institutional animal caregivers, and members of the animal ethics committee involving dosing of the drug regarding the weight of the animal and the route specified in the administration that shows maximum safety and efficacy and also handling of the animal during the administration to ensure voluntary and safe administration of therapeutic agents to the animal. Experimental refinement and minimization of adverse effects on animals regarding administration can be improved by close attention to detail of the medicine on the label and consideration of the route of administration for successful and accurate experimentation to ensure a minimum margin of error in the result obtained
References
- Abe, C., Tashiro, T., Tanakam K., Ogiharam R., Morita, H. J. (2009). a unique style of implantable and programmable infusion pump for tiny laboratory animals. J Pharmacol Toxicol strategies 59:7-12
- Abell, P., Pangilinan, G. N., Chellman, G. J. (1995). Novel restraint device for oral dosing of rabbits. Contemp high research lab Anim Sci 34:86-87 African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 8(6), pp. 960-964, 20 March, 2009
- African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 8 (6), pp. 960- 964, 20 March, 2009
Cite this article
-
APA : Paiman, A., Mohammadi, A., & Inam, R. (2016). Oral Drug Delivery to the Experimental Animals, A Mini Review. Global Drug Design & Development Review, I(I), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdddr.2016(I-I).03
-
CHICAGO : Paiman, Arif, Ahmad Mohammadi, and Rafia Inam. 2016. "Oral Drug Delivery to the Experimental Animals, A Mini Review." Global Drug Design & Development Review, I (I): 19-26 doi: 10.31703/gdddr.2016(I-I).03
-
HARVARD : PAIMAN, A., MOHAMMADI, A. & INAM, R. 2016. Oral Drug Delivery to the Experimental Animals, A Mini Review. Global Drug Design & Development Review, I, 19-26.
-
MHRA : Paiman, Arif, Ahmad Mohammadi, and Rafia Inam. 2016. "Oral Drug Delivery to the Experimental Animals, A Mini Review." Global Drug Design & Development Review, I: 19-26
-
MLA : Paiman, Arif, Ahmad Mohammadi, and Rafia Inam. "Oral Drug Delivery to the Experimental Animals, A Mini Review." Global Drug Design & Development Review, I.I (2016): 19-26 Print.
-
OXFORD : Paiman, Arif, Mohammadi, Ahmad, and Inam, Rafia (2016), "Oral Drug Delivery to the Experimental Animals, A Mini Review", Global Drug Design & Development Review, I (I), 19-26
-
TURABIAN : Paiman, Arif, Ahmad Mohammadi, and Rafia Inam. "Oral Drug Delivery to the Experimental Animals, A Mini Review." Global Drug Design & Development Review I, no. I (2016): 19-26. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdddr.2016(I-I).03