Pedicular Screw Instrumentation Outcome in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Scoliosis affects young and growing age population mostly in age of 10–16 years, having prevalence of 10-15% in literature and 90% of patients have idiopathic adolescence scoliosis. Our study will assess the curve correction by posterior spinal fusion technique the results of which if found comparable as in literature using different techniques. To find out the outcome in instrumentation related to pedicular screw in posterior spinal fusion in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis to improve the Cobb angle. 42 sufferers had been observed. After inclusion, a detailed clinical history was noted with general physical and systemic examination. Radiographs and MRI of the total spine had been performed. The point of intersection of vertical line was taken as preoperative Cobb angle. Deformity was categorized as moderate or severe based on Cobb angle on PA view. 14 years was mean age with standard deviation ± 3.26. 42% sufferers were male while 58% sufferers were female. 65% patients had corrected outcome on the other hand, 35% patients had not corrected outcome. Our study concludes that pedicular screw instrumentation had 65% corrected outcome in posterior spinal fusion in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis in terms of improvement in Cobb angle.
-
Outcome, Pedicular Screw Instrumentation, Posterior Spinal Fusion, Idiopathic Adolescent Scoliosis, Cobb Angle
-
(1) Muhammad Naeem
Saidu Teaching Hospital, Swat, KP, Pakistan.
(2) Muhammad Jamil
Timergara Teaching Hospital, Dir Lower, KP, Pakistan.
(3) Noor Ul Islam
Medical Officer, THQ Hospital, Shangla, Besham, KP, Pakistan.
(4) Muhammad Ayaz Khan
Head, Department of Orthopedic and Trauma, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
(5) Neelab
Department of Biotechnology, University of Malakand, KP, Pakistan.
(6) Qaiser Alam
Medical Officer, Saidu Teaching Hospital, Swat, KP, Pakistan.
- Agata, E., Raya, J., & Bago, J. (2017). Introversion the prevalent trait of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: an observational study. Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders, 12(27), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-017-0136-9
- Anekstein,Y., Mirovsky, Y., & Arnabitsky, V. (2012). Rever sing the concept: correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the convex rod de-rotation maneuver. Eur Spine J, 21, 1942–1949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2355-3
- Azimifar, F., Hassani, K., Saveh, A. H., & Ghomsheh, F. T. (2017). A medium invasiveness multi-level patient’s specific template for pedicle screw placement in the scoliosis surgery. BioMedical Engineering Online. 5, 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0421-0
- Basu, S., Rathinavelu, S., Baid, P. (2010). Posterior scoliosis correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using side-opening pedicle screw-rod system utilizing the axial translation technique. Indian J Orthop, 44(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.58605
- Cheng, K. M., & Gupta, C. (2003). Pical sublaminarwires versus pedicle screws— which provides better results forsurgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosisSpine, 30(18), 2104. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000179261.70845.b7
- Csernátony, Z., Kiss, L., Manó, S., & Hunya, Z. (2013). Our experience and early results with a complementary implant for the correction of major thoracic curves. Eur Spine J. 22(6), 1286. ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2698-4
- Gao, T., Lai, Q., & Zhou, S. (2017). Correlation between facet tropism and lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18(483), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1849-x
- Gauzy, J., Jouve, L., Accadbled, A., Blondel, B., & Bollini, G. (2011). Use of the universal clamp in adolescent idiopathicscoliosis for deformity correction and as an adjunct to fusion: 2-year follow-up. Journal of Children’s Orthopedics, 5(4), 273. Https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-011-0357-z
- Ghanem, I. B., Hagnere, F., Dubousset, J. F., Watier, B., Skalli, W., & Lavaste, F. (1997). Intraoperative electronic analysis of three- dimensional vertebral displacement aftercotrel-dubousset rod rotation , a preliminary report.Spine. https://doi.org/1997;22:1913.
- Hassankhani, E. G., Kashani, O. F., Moradkhani, S., Hassankhani, G. G., & Shakeri, M. T. (2016). Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcome of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with posterior instrumentation. Adv in Med, 4(05). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7639727
- Helenius, I., Remes, V., Yrjonen, T., Ylikoski, M., Schlenzka, D., Helenius, M., & Poussa, M. (2003). Harrington and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in adolescent diopathic scoliosis. Long-term functional and radiographic outcomes. JBone Joint Surg Am. 85, 2303. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200312000-00006
- Ilharreborde, B., Even, J., & Lefevre, Y. (2010). Hybrid constructs fortridimensional correction of the thoracic spine in adolescentidiopathic scoliosis: a comparative analysis of universal clampsversus hooks. Spine, 35, 306. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b7c7c4
- Kim, J., Lenke, G., & Kim, L. (2006). Comparative analysis ofpedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinalfusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine, 31(3), 291. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000197865.20803.d4
- Kim, Y. J., Bridwell, K. H., Lenke, L. G., Kim, J., Cho, S. K. (2005). Proximal junctionalmeasurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine, 30(18), 2045. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000179084.45839.ad
- Konieczny, M. R., Senyurt, H., & Krauspe, R. (2013). Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics; 7(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0457-4
- Lowenstein, J., Matsumoto, H., & Vitale, M. (2007). Coronaland sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis:a comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracichook lumbar screw constructs. Spine, 32, 448. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000255030.78293.fd
- Şarlak, A. Y., Atmaca, H., Buluç, L., Tosun, B., & Musaoğlu, B. (2009). Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis treated with posterior arthrodesis and segmental pedicle screw instrumentation before the age of 9 years: a 5-year follow-up. Scoliosis, 4(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-4-1
Cite this article
-
APA : Naeem, M., Jamil, M., & Islam, N. U. (2022). Pedicular Screw Instrumentation Outcome in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII(II), 52 -58. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdddr.2022(VII-II).07
-
CHICAGO : Naeem, Muhammad, Muhammad Jamil, and Noor Ul Islam. 2022. "Pedicular Screw Instrumentation Outcome in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis." Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII (II): 52 -58 doi: 10.31703/gdddr.2022(VII-II).07
-
HARVARD : NAEEM, M., JAMIL, M. & ISLAM, N. U. 2022. Pedicular Screw Instrumentation Outcome in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII, 52 -58.
-
MHRA : Naeem, Muhammad, Muhammad Jamil, and Noor Ul Islam. 2022. "Pedicular Screw Instrumentation Outcome in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis." Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII: 52 -58
-
MLA : Naeem, Muhammad, Muhammad Jamil, and Noor Ul Islam. "Pedicular Screw Instrumentation Outcome in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis." Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII.II (2022): 52 -58 Print.
-
OXFORD : Naeem, Muhammad, Jamil, Muhammad, and Islam, Noor Ul (2022), "Pedicular Screw Instrumentation Outcome in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis", Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII (II), 52 -58
-
TURABIAN : Naeem, Muhammad, Muhammad Jamil, and Noor Ul Islam. "Pedicular Screw Instrumentation Outcome in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis." Global Drug Design & Development Review VII, no. II (2022): 52 -58. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdddr.2022(VII-II).07